Re: Request for feedback: Streams API

Thanks for the update Feras.

Re getting `wide review` of the latest [ED], which groups, lists and 
individuals should be asked to review the spec?

In IRC just now, jgraham mentioned TC39, WHATWG and Domenic. Would 
someone please ask these two groups to review the latest ED?

Aymeric - would you please ask the WebRTC list(s) to review the latest 
ED or provide the list name(s) and I'll ask them.

-Thanks, ArtB

[ED] <>

On 12/4/13 11:27 AM, ext Feras Moussa wrote:
> The editors of the Streams API have reached a milestone where we feel 
> many of the major issues that have been identified thus far are now 
> resolved and incorporated in the editors draft.
> The editors draft [1] has been heavily updated and reviewed the past 
> few weeks to address all concerns raised, including:
> 1. Separation into two distinct types -ReadableByteStream and 
> WritableByteStream
> 2. Explicit support for back pressure management
> 3. Improvements to help with pipe( ) and flow-control management
> 4. Updated spec text and diagrams for further clarifications
> There are still a set of bugs being tracked in bugzilla. We would like 
> others to please review the updated proposal, and provide any feedback 
> they may have (or file bugs).
> Thanks.
> -Feras
> [1]

Received on Wednesday, 4 December 2013 17:59:38 UTC