- From: Charles McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru>
- Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 21:46:11 +0100
- To: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, "Arthur Barstow" <art.barstow@nokia.com>
On Thu, 21 Nov 2013 19:44:29 +0100, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Arun completed processing the comments [Comments] for the Last Call
> version of File API [LCWD]. Although the comments resulted in changes to
> the spec (see [Diff]), no new features were added and the changes are
> considered bug fixes. The most significant change is the Constructor
> APIs in Section 7 - see [Section-7].
>
> Arun proposes the spec be advanced to Candidate Recommendation and this
> is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish a CR using the following
> version as the basis:
>
> <http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/FileAPI/>
Please do.
...
> I propose 3 months as the minimal amount of time before we are ready to
> advance the spec to Propose Recommendation and I propose we re-use the
> CR exit criteria we used for the IDB CR:
>
> [[
> During the Candidate Recommendation period, which ends @T+3months, the
> WG will complete its test suite. Before this specification exits
> Candidate Recommendation, two or more independent implementations must
> pass each test, although no single implementation must pass each test.
I suggest s/each/every/ here just to disambiguate a bit more. But I can
live with these as criteria.
cheers
chaals
--
Charles McCathie Nevile - Consultant (web standards) CTO Office, Yandex
chaals@yandex-team.ru Find more at http://yandex.com
Received on Friday, 22 November 2013 15:46:48 UTC