- From: Charles McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru>
- Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 21:46:11 +0100
- To: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, "Arthur Barstow" <art.barstow@nokia.com>
On Thu, 21 Nov 2013 19:44:29 +0100, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > Arun completed processing the comments [Comments] for the Last Call > version of File API [LCWD]. Although the comments resulted in changes to > the spec (see [Diff]), no new features were added and the changes are > considered bug fixes. The most significant change is the Constructor > APIs in Section 7 - see [Section-7]. > > Arun proposes the spec be advanced to Candidate Recommendation and this > is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish a CR using the following > version as the basis: > > <http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/FileAPI/> Please do. ... > I propose 3 months as the minimal amount of time before we are ready to > advance the spec to Propose Recommendation and I propose we re-use the > CR exit criteria we used for the IDB CR: > > [[ > During the Candidate Recommendation period, which ends @T+3months, the > WG will complete its test suite. Before this specification exits > Candidate Recommendation, two or more independent implementations must > pass each test, although no single implementation must pass each test. I suggest s/each/every/ here just to disambiguate a bit more. But I can live with these as criteria. cheers chaals -- Charles McCathie Nevile - Consultant (web standards) CTO Office, Yandex chaals@yandex-team.ru Find more at http://yandex.com
Received on Friday, 22 November 2013 15:46:48 UTC