Re: CfC: publish Candidate Recommendation of File API; deadline November 28

Since this CfC was started, Arun reopened [23853] on November 28 and 
[23946] was filed on November 30.

Arun - what's the plan here vis--vis this CfC?

-Thanks, ArtB

[23853] <https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23853>
[23946] <https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23946>


On 11/21/13 1:44 PM, ext Arthur Barstow wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Arun completed processing the comments [Comments] for the Last Call 
> version of File API [LCWD]. Although the comments resulted in changes 
> to the spec (see [Diff]), no new features were added and the changes 
> are considered bug fixes. The most significant change is the 
> Constructor APIs in Section 7 - see [Section-7].
>
> Arun proposes the spec be advanced to Candidate Recommendation and 
> this is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish a CR  using the 
> following version as the basis:
>
>   <http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/FileAPI/>
>
> This CfC satisfies: a) the group's requirement to "record the group's 
> decision to request advancement" to CR; and b) "General Requirements 
> for Advancement on the Recommendation Track" as defined in the Process 
> Document 
> <http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#transition-reqs>.
>
> Note the Status of the Document section and References in the Draft CR 
> need some changes.
>
> I propose 3 months as the minimal amount of time before we are ready 
> to advance the spec to Propose Recommendation  and I propose we re-use 
> the CR exit criteria we used for the IDB CR:
>
> [[
> During the Candidate Recommendation period, which ends @T+3months, the 
> WG will complete its test suite. Before this specification exits 
> Candidate Recommendation, two or more independent implementations must 
> pass each test, although no single implementation must pass each test. 
> The group will also create an Implementation Report.
> ]]
>
> If anyone has feedback regarding features that could be marked "at 
> risk", please speak up during this CfC.
>
> Positive response to this CfC is preferred and encouraged and silence 
> will be considered as agreeing with the proposal. The deadline for 
> comments is November 28 and all comments should be sent to 
> public-webapps @ w3.org.
>
> -Thanks, ArtB
>
> [Comments] <http://www.w3.org/wiki/Webapps/LCWD-FileAPI-20130912>
> [LCWD] <http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-FileAPI-20130912/>
> [Section-7] 
> <http://services.w3.org/htmldiff?doc1=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FTR%2F2013%2FWD-FileAPI-20130912%2F&doc2=http%3A%2F%2Fdev.w3.org%2F2006%2Fwebapi%2FFileAPI%2F#file>
> [Diff] 
> <http://services.w3.org/htmldiff?doc1=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FTR%2F2013%2FWD-FileAPI-20130912%2F&doc2=http%3A%2F%2Fdev.w3.org%2F2006%2Fwebapi%2FFileAPI%2F>
>
>

Received on Sunday, 1 December 2013 15:32:29 UTC