W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > July to September 2011

Re: [editing] Using public-webapps for editing discussion

From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 12:48:04 -0400
Message-ID: <4E777244.4040205@nokia.com>
To: ext Aryeh Gregor <ayg@aryeh.name>
CC: Ryosuke Niwa <rniwa@webkit.org>, Ehsan Akhgari <ehsan@mozilla.com>, Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>, W3C WebApps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
Aryeh - coming back to your question below ...

Since you are the Chair of the HTML Editing APIs CG [CG], would you 
please explain what you see as the relationship between the CG and 
WebApps vis--vis the Editing spec? In particular, what role(s) do the 
CG and WG have?

For example [1] indicates the CG already has a mail list 
(public-editing) so when would it be used versus public-webapps?

-Thanks, AB

[CG] http://www.w3.org/community/editing/

On 9/13/11 4:27 PM, ext Aryeh Gregor wrote:
> For the last several months, I was working on a new specification,
> which I hosted on aryeh.name.  Now we've created a new Community Group
> at the W3C to host it:
> http://aryeh.name/spec/editing/editing.html
> http://www.w3.org/community/editing/
> Things are still being worked out, but one issue is what mailing list
> to use for discussion.  I don't want to create new tiny mailing lists
> -- I think we should reuse some existing established list where the
> stakeholders are already present.  Previously I was using the whatwg
> list, but as a token of good faith toward the W3C, I'd prefer to
> switch to public-webapps, even though my spec is not a WebApps WG
> deliverable.  (If it ever does move to a REC track spec, though, which
> the Community Group process makes easy, it will undoubtedly be in the
> WebApps WG.)
> Does anyone object to using this list to discuss the editing spec?
Received on Monday, 19 September 2011 16:49:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:13:23 UTC