I support this. On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Ryosuke Niwa <rniwa@webkit.org> wrote: > I think it's a great idea to get your spec more attention in W3C community > specially because some UA vendors don't participate in discussions on > whatwg. > > - Ryosuke > > On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Aryeh Gregor <ayg@aryeh.name> wrote: > >> For the last several months, I was working on a new specification, >> which I hosted on aryeh.name. Now we've created a new Community Group >> at the W3C to host it: >> >> http://aryeh.name/spec/editing/editing.html >> http://www.w3.org/community/editing/ >> >> Things are still being worked out, but one issue is what mailing list >> to use for discussion. I don't want to create new tiny mailing lists >> -- I think we should reuse some existing established list where the >> stakeholders are already present. Previously I was using the whatwg >> list, but as a token of good faith toward the W3C, I'd prefer to >> switch to public-webapps, even though my spec is not a WebApps WG >> deliverable. (If it ever does move to a REC track spec, though, which >> the Community Group process makes easy, it will undoubtedly be in the >> WebApps WG.) >> >> Does anyone object to using this list to discuss the editing spec? >> > >
Received on Tuesday, 13 September 2011 21:12:39 UTC