Re: [editing] Using public-webapps for editing discussion

I think it's a great idea to get your spec more attention in W3C community
specially because some UA vendors don't participate in discussions on

- Ryosuke

On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Aryeh Gregor <> wrote:

> For the last several months, I was working on a new specification,
> which I hosted on  Now we've created a new Community Group
> at the W3C to host it:
> Things are still being worked out, but one issue is what mailing list
> to use for discussion.  I don't want to create new tiny mailing lists
> -- I think we should reuse some existing established list where the
> stakeholders are already present.  Previously I was using the whatwg
> list, but as a token of good faith toward the W3C, I'd prefer to
> switch to public-webapps, even though my spec is not a WebApps WG
> deliverable.  (If it ever does move to a REC track spec, though, which
> the Community Group process makes easy, it will undoubtedly be in the
> WebApps WG.)
> Does anyone object to using this list to discuss the editing spec?

Received on Tuesday, 13 September 2011 20:31:37 UTC