Re: [editing] Using public-webapps for editing discussion

Since some related functionality was included (at one point) in the 
HTML5 spec, it seems like we should ask the HTML WG for feedback on 
Aryeh's email.

Aryeh told me there are some related bugs:

Maciej, Sam, Ruby - do have a sense if the HTML WG has a (strong) 
opinion on Aryeh's question below?

-Art Barstow

On 9/13/11 4:27 PM, ext Aryeh Gregor wrote:
> For the last several months, I was working on a new specification,
> which I hosted on  Now we've created a new Community Group
> at the W3C to host it:
> Things are still being worked out, but one issue is what mailing list
> to use for discussion.  I don't want to create new tiny mailing lists
> -- I think we should reuse some existing established list where the
> stakeholders are already present.  Previously I was using the whatwg
> list, but as a token of good faith toward the W3C, I'd prefer to
> switch to public-webapps, even though my spec is not a WebApps WG
> deliverable.  (If it ever does move to a REC track spec, though, which
> the Community Group process makes easy, it will undoubtedly be in the
> WebApps WG.)
> Does anyone object to using this list to discuss the editing spec?

Received on Wednesday, 14 September 2011 23:31:47 UTC