Re: RfC: how to organize the DOM specs [Was: CfC: publish new WD of DOM Core] from Jonas Sicking on 2011-08-31 (public-webapps@w3.org from July to September 2011)

From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 09:52:34 -0700
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Cc: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, Adrian Bateman <adrianba@microsoft.com>, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>, Jacob Rossi <jrossi@microsoft.com>, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
Message-ID: <CA+c2ei_D=ZpehUKxc3SQprsmeP+-FTspake7Zj3CdHFgMNNd3Q@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 8:25 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com> wrote:
> I think defining all of these in one specification is fine. Currently the
> specification is only 37 pages when printed. That will certainly grow once
> we add ranges, examples, and more introductory text, but will also still be
> well below the larger specifications. (Jonas' concern is already addressed
> in the specification with notes that reference the other relevant places in
> case a feature (so far only some constructor methods on Document) is defined
> across sections.)

Is this explicitly mentioned in the spec? Otherwise how will anyone be
able to take advantage of this fact?

/ Jonas

Received on Wednesday, 31 August 2011 16:53:31 UTC