- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 14:05:32 +0200
- To: public-webapps@w3.org, "Cyril Concolato" <cyril.concolato@telecom-paristech.fr>
On Wed, 10 Aug 2011 09:36:33 +0200, Cyril Concolato <cyril.concolato@telecom-paristech.fr> wrote: > Le 09/08/2011 19:34, Arthur Barstow a écrit : >> On August 9, WebApps published LCWD #2 of the Progress Events spec: >> >> http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-progress-events-20110809/ > Section 2.1: > "If this is for some reason not possible prefix the extension in some > way and start the prefix with an uppercase letter. E.g. if company Foo > wants to add a private method bar() it could be named FooBar() to > prevent clashes with a potential future standardized bar()." > This sentence in hard to read and unclear. Please rephrase/fix it. Suggestions? > Section 4.2: > It should indicate what the requirements for other specifications are > to define properly the use of these events. There are no requirements. > Section 4.3: > Why aren't the names of events, and the instant and number of times they > are dispatched, not normatively defined ? This would be beneficial for > consistency in the web platform, wouldn't it? Because it very much depends on the context. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Sunday, 14 August 2011 12:06:01 UTC