- From: Sean Hogan <shogun70@westnet.com.au>
- Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 20:59:00 +1000
- To: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
- CC: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
Lachlan Hunt wrote: > Lachlan Hunt wrote: >> Sean Hogan wrote: >>> I think a couple of those features are pretty low priority: >>> >>> - I don't see the point of collective queries on NodeLists. >>> Are there any references for the proposal? >>> Otherwise I can't think of any useful queries that can't already be >>> achieved with a single querySelectorAll(). >> >> It was discussed a couple of days ago in IRC. It's based on the >> functionality provided and needed by javascript libraries. > > Sorry, I forgot to provide the link. The relevant discussion is > spread out quite a bit throughout this log, beginning here. > > http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/whatwg/20090922#l-1111 > > I've highlighted the relevant parts. > I couldn't see where it was needed, only that it was possible in jQuery. I still can't think of any NodeLists that this could usefully be applied to that couldn't be achieved with a single querySelectorAll(). At least until we can create arbitrary NodeLists.
Received on Thursday, 24 September 2009 10:59:46 UTC