- From: Laxmi Narsimha Rao Oruganti <Laxmi.Oruganti@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 00:50:04 +0800
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- CC: "Nikunj R. Mehta" <nikunj.mehta@oracle.com>, Aaron Boodman <aa@google.com>, "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>
That definitely relaxes my mind :). And, thanks for pointing me to the exact text. Thanks, Laxmi -----Original Message----- From: Ian Hickson [mailto:ian@hixie.ch] Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 7:11 AM To: Laxmi Narsimha Rao Oruganti Cc: Nikunj R. Mehta; Aaron Boodman; public-webapps@w3.org Subject: RE: [WebStorage] Concerns on spec section 'Processing Model' On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, Laxmi Narsimha Rao Oruganti wrote: > > I am unable to understand on how we are expecting spec readers to > interpret the spec lines. At one end, we are not open to make it clear > that it is a hint/model, and on the other end we are ok to not > implementing that way. Think about a person reading the spec, who is > *not* in touch with this discussion forum; he immediately will conclude > that he *must* implement in the same way as we describe in the spec. > So, yes his implementation will be interoperable but we are essentially > making whole world implement the way we want:(. I sincerely hope people > put the readers hat than editors hat here. It is so sad to see people > are hesitant to detail out implantation aspects as hints. I now have a > great respect for IETF specs, where they detail out everything in clear. > If we want the spec to have quality, then I suggest keep implementation > details completely out, but if we think that it is not the way W3C specs > are written. Then, I would suggest keep those implementation details as > hints and have the spec text clear like for example "The database system > should allow only one writer at a time. *One way* vendors could ensure > this is by taking up an exclusive lock on the database file ". The conformance section says: # Conformance requirements phrased as algorithms or specific steps may be # implemented in any manner, so long as the end result is equivalent. (In # particular, the algorithms defined in this specification are intended to # be easy to follow, and not intended to be performant.) -- http://dev.w3.org/html5/webdatabase/#conformance-requirements Is that not clear enough? -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Thursday, 6 August 2009 16:50:49 UTC