- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 01:40:54 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Laxmi Narsimha Rao Oruganti <Laxmi.Oruganti@microsoft.com>
- Cc: "Nikunj R. Mehta" <nikunj.mehta@oracle.com>, Aaron Boodman <aa@google.com>, "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, Laxmi Narsimha Rao Oruganti wrote: > > I am unable to understand on how we are expecting spec readers to > interpret the spec lines. At one end, we are not open to make it clear > that it is a hint/model, and on the other end we are ok to not > implementing that way. Think about a person reading the spec, who is > *not* in touch with this discussion forum; he immediately will conclude > that he *must* implement in the same way as we describe in the spec. > So, yes his implementation will be interoperable but we are essentially > making whole world implement the way we want:(. I sincerely hope people > put the readers hat than editors hat here. It is so sad to see people > are hesitant to detail out implantation aspects as hints. I now have a > great respect for IETF specs, where they detail out everything in clear. > If we want the spec to have quality, then I suggest keep implementation > details completely out, but if we think that it is not the way W3C specs > are written. Then, I would suggest keep those implementation details as > hints and have the spec text clear like for example "The database system > should allow only one writer at a time. *One way* vendors could ensure > this is by taking up an exclusive lock on the database file ". The conformance section says: # Conformance requirements phrased as algorithms or specific steps may be # implemented in any manner, so long as the end result is equivalent. (In # particular, the algorithms defined in this specification are intended to # be easy to follow, and not intended to be performant.) -- http://dev.w3.org/html5/webdatabase/#conformance-requirements Is that not clear enough? -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Wednesday, 5 August 2009 01:41:34 UTC