- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 07:12:06 -0400
- To: "marcosc@opera.com" <marcosc@opera.com>
- Cc: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
Marcos - I prefer your 2nd proposal. Unless contrary views are expressed in the next few days, I recommend adding your proposal to the ED. -Regards, Art Barstow On Mar 12, 2009, at 12:53 PM, ext Marcos Caceres wrote: > Hi, > I've decided that having the screenshots at the root of the widget (or > at the root of localized folders) is just messy. Also, the naming > convention will probably confuse authors, so I've created a screenshot > element for consideration. > > [[ > > The screenshot Element > A screenshot is a file inside the widget resource that graphically > represents the widget in a running state. > > Context in which this element may be used: > In the widget element. > > Occurrences: > Zero or more. > > Expected children: > none. > > Attributes > src: Required. A valid path that points to a file inside the widget > resource. > > Usage Example > > <widget xmlns="http://www.w3.org/ns/widgets"> > <screenshot src="/screenshots/mainscreen.jpg"/> > <screenshot src="/screenshots/level1.jpg"/> > </widget> > ]] > > I considered adding a "preferred" attribute, but then decided that > it's first declared is most preferred, and so on. This will be > reflected in the order in which the screenshots are stored in the > configuration defaults (i.e., I'll make it explicit that screenshots > should be stored and presented in the order they appear in the > document). > > WDYT? > > Kind regards, > Marcos
Received on Friday, 13 March 2009 11:13:30 UTC