- From: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 12:44:35 +1100
- To: "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>, W3C HTML Mailing List <www-html@w3.org>
Hi, WebApps WG and XHTML2 WG- There is a potential conflict between the <access> element defined in the Widgets 1.0: Packaging and Configuration specification [1] and the <access> element defined in the XHTML Access Module specification [2] (most recent draft also available [3]). It may be that both are never used in the same document; <widget:access> is intended for use in a configuration document, while <access:access> is intended for (X)HTML/SVG documents. However, both elements are rather loosely named, and not immediately clear in intent. I propose that both specs change the name of their element. A better name for Widgets might be <securityModel> or something, and for the Access spec, a better name might be <keyNav>. Thoughts? [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/widgets/#the-access-element [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-access/#sec_3.1. [3] http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2008/ED-xhtml-access-20081023/ Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs
Received on Friday, 20 February 2009 01:44:53 UTC