- From: 이종흔 <jhlee@infraware.co.kr>
- Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 17:45:07 +0900
- To: "Arthur Barstow" <art.barstow@nokia.com>, "ext Alex Kuang" <Alex.Kuang@microsoft.com>
- Cc: <public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org>
Hi, all I have fixed the problems regarding initStorageEvent & attachEvent. Thank you for comments. :) -----Original Message----- From: Arthur Barstow [mailto:art.barstow@nokia.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2012 4:53 AM To: ext Alex Kuang; 이종흔 Cc: public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org Subject: Re: Web Storage tests; deadline March 6 Thanks for the review Alex! Jong Heun - I would appreciate it, if you would please fix the problems that Alex identified and notify this list. -Thanks, AB On 3/5/12 2:00 PM, ext Alex Kuang wrote: > I've reviewed the tests and found out that initStorageEvent API is used in the below 4 tests: > http://w3c-test.org/webapps/WebStorage/tests/submissions/Infraware/eve > nt_local_constructor.html > http://w3c-test.org/webapps/WebStorage/tests/submissions/Infraware/eve > nt_session_constructor.html > http://w3c-test.org/webapps/WebStorage/tests/submissions/Infraware/eve > nt_local_storageeventinit.html > http://w3c-test.org/webapps/WebStorage/tests/submissions/Infraware/eve > nt_session_storageeventinit.html > > "initStorageEvent" appears in the old spec (and it takes 8 parameters): > http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-webstorage-20110901/ > > However, it is removed from the current spec and Event constructor is recommend: > http://www.w3.org/TR/webstorage/ > > Also, the tests check for existence of attachEvent API which is not standard compliant. > > Thanks, > Alex > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Arthur Barstow [mailto:art.barstow@nokia.com] > Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2012 4:11 AM > To: public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org > Subject: RfR: Web Storage tests; deadline March 6 > > This is a Request for Review [RfR] for all of the tests Infraware submitted for the Web Storage spec: > > > http://w3c-test.org/webapps/WebStorage/tests/submissions/Infraware/ > > If you have any comments, please send them by March 6. > > If you review any set of the tests and find no issues, please state that as a reply to this RfR (so we can get a sense of whether or not anyone reviewed the tests). > > In the absence of any comments, these tests will be considered Approved. > > -AB > > [RfR] http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/Approval > > >
Received on Tuesday, 6 March 2012 14:57:29 UTC