W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org > November 2011

Re: Identifying "Test Spec Editors"; deadline Nov 11

From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 18:07:09 +0100
To: "ext Adrian Bateman" <adrianba@microsoft.com>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, "public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org" <public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org>, "Arthur Barstow" <art.barstow@nokia.com>
Cc: "Kris Krueger" <krisk@microsoft.com>
Message-ID: <op.v4v9t7blwxe0ny@widsith.eng.oslo.osa>
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 14:09:15 +0100, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>  

> On 11/11/11 7:53 PM, ext Adrian Bateman wrote:
>> On Friday, November 04, 2011 4:59 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
>>> One of the topics discussed this week was to designate a "Test Spec
>>> Editor(s)" for each of our specs.
>> We're supportive of this idea.
>>> (BTW, the title of "Test Spec Editor" is a bit of a straw-man, so
>>> proposals for other titles are also welcome.)
>> I wonder if Test Suite Facilitator (or similar) is a better title. We  
>> use "Facilitator"
>> in HTML WG and I think it may be more of a coordination role than a  
>> person that does
>> all the editing work of the test suite (that's how it seems to work in  
>> HTML at the
>> moment).
> If anyone objects to "Test Facilitator", please speak up; otherwise, at  
> the end of next week I will add that role to PubStatus' Testing column  
> and issue some type of Call for Test Facilitators for our various test  
> suites:

I positively support it, basically for the reasons Adrian outlined.


Charles 'chaals' McCathieNevile  Opera Software, Standards Group
     je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg kan litt norsk
http://my.opera.com/chaals       Try Opera: http://www.opera.com
Received on Sunday, 13 November 2011 17:08:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:52:55 UTC