Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Allow applications to access higher-precision mouse movement data (Issue #102)

kvnloo left a comment (w3c/pointerlock#102)

For latency testing, precision and timing should probably be measured separately.

A useful experiment would record hardware/input timestamps, `pointerrawupdate` dispatch timestamps, and the raw delta sequence under `unadjustedMovement`, then compare:

`device sample → browser receipt → renderer dispatch → application handler`

That would distinguish precision loss from coalescing/scheduling latency instead of treating both as "raw input quality.".


-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/pointerlock/issues/102#issuecomment-5941894728
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3c/pointerlock/issues/102/5941894728@github.com>