Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Propose to add a static field to indicate whether `unadjustedMovement` is supported. (Issue #90)

kvnloo left a comment (w3c/pointerlock#90)

A static capability flag may still leave a race between reported capability and an actual lock request.

An alternative is a capability query returning the exact supported pointer-lock options, analogous to querying device capabilities elsewhere on the platform.

That also scales if future low-latency/raw-input options are added without introducing another static boolean for each one.


-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/pointerlock/issues/90#issuecomment-5941898415
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3c/pointerlock/issues/90/5941898415@github.com>