Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Clarify cache access in Handle Fetch (PR #1786)

yoshisatoyanagisawa left a comment (w3c/ServiceWorker#1786)

> How is this related to [whatwg/storage#185](https://github.com/whatwg/storage/pull/185)?

This PR is the scenario without the change.
My original intention was making the storage API to accept the storage key to look up the cache storage.  However, in https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1784#issuecomment-3154140113, I was asked not to use the storage key if possible. (and I understand https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1784#issuecomment-3144557896 is suggesting to use reserved clients as an environment).  If we go with that way, we do not need the way to look up the cache storage via storage key, and https://github.com/whatwg/storage/pull/185 will be abandoned.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/pull/1786#issuecomment-3231718760
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3c/ServiceWorker/pull/1786/c3231718760@github.com>