Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] TAG review for web app `scope_extensions` (Issue #875)

OK, I don't think that is a good goal.  Every origin has a different set of resources.  Having one origin able to speak for others, even if it is same-site with those origins, breaks the fundamental scoping properties that underpin origins.

Yes, we have a privacy boundary at the site level and a bunch of stuff sort of expands to fill that scope by virtue of having some interaction with cookies.  This does not.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/875#issuecomment-2211715884
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/875/2211715884@github.com>