- From: Steve Orvell <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2024 07:18:46 -0800
- To: WICG/webcomponents <webcomponents@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 17 December 2024 15:18:50 UTC
> There has been a reasonable amount of https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/961 that the name referenceTarget is difficult to understand. I addition to being hard to understand, there has also [been](https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/961#issuecomment-2457573238) [feedback](https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/961#issuecomment-2483716803) that it's too long. ### Suggestions | name | understandability | size | |------|----------------|------| | `to` | not confusable but similar to `for` need docs to understand | 2 | | `refsto` | more explicit than `to` and the term `ref` is generally used | 6 | | `refdelegate` | similar to `referencedelegate` | 11 | | `delegate` | generic like `to` but longer | 8 | | `delegatesto` | clear verb (similar to `aria-flowto`) | 11 | -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/WICG/webcomponents/issues/1087#issuecomment-2548732834 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <WICG/webcomponents/issues/1087/2548732834@github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 17 December 2024 15:18:50 UTC