[whatwg/fetch] Editorial: account for removal of AbortSignal's follow (PR #1646)

For https://github.com/whatwg/dom/pull/1152.

---

This is incomplete. https://fetch.spec.whatwg.org/#dom-request-clone needs to be updated as well. While we could probably leave https://fetch.spec.whatwg.org/#request-create (also called by Service Workers) alone, that doesn't seem entirely right as we'd be creating a redundant `AbortSignal` object.

Would the best solution here be that "create" takes a signal(s?) argument and then uses that to create a new composite signal for itself?

It doesn't have to do anything for service workers it seems, but if service workers were to pass an empty list it'd do the same thing it does today.

cc @jakearchibald @shaseley 
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:

  https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/pull/1646

-- Commit Summary --

  * Editorial: account for removal of AbortSignal's follow

-- File Changes --

    M fetch.bs (9)

-- Patch Links --

https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/pull/1646.patch
https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/pull/1646.diff

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/pull/1646
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <whatwg/fetch/pull/1646@github.com>