Re: [whatwg/url] Provide a succinct grammar for valid URL strings (#479)

> @bagder what do you mean with "does not cover"? It covers all of them.

Sorry. I was wrong.

I thought I read that  (and maybe I did but it has been edit out since). Or maybe I was just drunk. Still, the document mentions many schemes but only such that are/were ever supported by browsers.

I don't think the document is very clear about this fact (possibly caused by assumptions). 

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/url/issues/479#issuecomment-1233889449
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <whatwg/url/issues/479/1233889449@github.com>

Received on Thursday, 1 September 2022 07:54:23 UTC