Re: [whatwg/url] Provide a succinct grammar for valid URL strings (#479) from Anne van Kesteren on 2022-09-01 (public-webapps-github@w3.org from September 2022)

From: Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2022 07:46:17 -0700
To: whatwg/url <url@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <whatwg/url/issues/479/1234384610@github.com>

> Is the way in which non-special URLs are parsed so safe and generic that it won’t cause problems with any of them?

Yup, apart from certain edge case it should mostly match the RFC. It used to be worse and mostly divide the string up into a scheme and path, but that was a long time ago. (And even then it wouldn't really be incompatible as most schemes require post-processing of some kind anyway. You just end up with a different division of labor.)

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/url/issues/479#issuecomment-1234384610

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <whatwg/url/issues/479/1234384610@github.com>

Received on Thursday, 1 September 2022 14:46:30 UTC