Re: [whatwg/url] Provide a succinct grammar for valid URL strings (#479) from Alwin Blok on 2022-09-01 (public-webapps-github@w3.org from September 2022)

From: Alwin Blok <notifications@github.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2022 10:57:08 -0700
To: whatwg/url <url@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <whatwg/url/issues/479/1234606019@github.com>

> Yup, apart from certain edge case it should mostly match the RFC

What if you start parsing them against a base URL? I mean, at a glance at least some are incompatible.
And their standard texts? I assume most of them reference specific parts of 3986. I'd be very surprised if they can use the standard as a drop-in replacement for the RFCs.

I can check for myself, of course.



-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/url/issues/479#issuecomment-1234606019
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <whatwg/url/issues/479/1234606019@github.com>

Received on Thursday, 1 September 2022 17:57:21 UTC