Re: [whatwg/fetch] Process subresource link headers (PR #1409)

@annevk - do you agree with my argument that this is fine for active resources (e.g. scripts, styles)? If so, that could be a path forward and I can see if there's implementation interest on the Chromium side to remove that support for passive resources.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/pull/1409#issuecomment-1092544593
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <whatwg/fetch/pull/1409/c1092544593@github.com>

Received on Friday, 8 April 2022 07:33:46 UTC