Re: [whatwg/fetch] Process subresource link headers (PR #1409)

> To be clear, I think `fetch()` acting on `Link` headers in such a way would be a rather egregious layering violation. Doing it for a select set of endpoints that already can end up resulting in multiple fetches is quite reasonable however.

I'm not sure it's a layering violation but I also don't think it's a strong enough use case, so the end result is a consensus AFAIC :)

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/pull/1409#issuecomment-1104128461
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <whatwg/fetch/pull/1409/c1104128461@github.com>