- From: Noam Rosenthal <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2022 00:34:34 -0700
- To: whatwg/fetch <fetch@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Saturday, 9 April 2022 07:34:46 UTC
> @annevk - do you agree with my argument that this is fine for active resources (e.g. scripts, styles)? If so, that could be a path forward and I can see if there's implementation interest on the Chromium side to remove that support for passive resources. I can see how we would specify it as a map of which request destination can load which other request destinations. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/pull/1409#issuecomment-1093776742 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <whatwg/fetch/pull/1409/c1093776742@github.com>
Received on Saturday, 9 April 2022 07:34:46 UTC