Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] WebID (#622)

> This name overlaps with existing work in W3C, which isn't ideal.

Ack, and on it. My mistake for missing the conflict. The very first line of the explainer contains the context, the status, our intent and how we are acting on it:

> not to be confused with [this](https://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/spec/) WebID whose authors have [graciously](https://github.com/WICG/WebID/issues/54#issuecomment-783605484) allowed us to use this as a codename until we [find](https://github.com/WICG/WebID/issues/41#issuecomment-712304910) a better one


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/622#issuecomment-827742555

Received on Tuesday, 27 April 2021 16:28:27 UTC