Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Service Worker Subresource Filter (#1584)

Hi Noah, thanks for starting the issue. If I understand correctly then, this is essentially issue #1454 but with a different API that specifies the URL fragment instead of the URL path or relative URLs.

I spoke briefly with  @jakearchibald and using the fragment section only indeed seemed hacky. I just want to confirm how attached you are to the fragment solution. Is this part of the envisioned final API form, or is it intended as a temporary workaround to avoid the complexities of issue #1454 for the purpose of getting an experiment started via Chrome's origin trial framework to gather performance data?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1584#issuecomment-826555389