Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Service Worker Subresource Filter (#1584)

Yes, your understanding is correct. 

It's not something we're attached to, and definitely not the envisioned final API form. This was just the minimum we determined we'd need to conduct the experiment. I agree it seems hacky. 

Perhaps there's another way we could approach this while keeping complexity minimal with a somehow pared down version of the URL path or relative URLs?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1584#issuecomment-826974316

Received on Monday, 26 April 2021 16:23:17 UTC