Re: [whatwg/fetch] HTTP cache partitioning (#943)

That's very strange. @youennf thoughts?

@alexmturner thanks! As for the tests, from a quick skim they look good, but the naming could use a bit of work to instead talk about top-level site and also cross-site rather than cross-origin. One thing that might be worth doing is to cover a bunch more MIME types to ensure that any kind of specialized caches are also covered. @bakulf pointed me to https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/source/toolkit/components/antitracking/test/browser/browser_staticPartition_cache.js#158-183 which unfortunately were not written as web-platform-tests. (I don't think that should block this PR though.)

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/pull/943#issuecomment-643202939

Received on Friday, 12 June 2020 10:37:57 UTC