- From: Frank Topel <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2020 09:38:46 -0700
- To: w3c/webcomponents <webcomponents@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Monday, 8 June 2020 16:38:59 UTC
From a veteran frontend developer: Honestly I don't care how popular any library is, or how it has been sitting on a name. All the alternatives suggested - and how much they suck - clearly show that the library **must** step back here and rename their project. Standards - and consistent naming in standards - **is way more important than any third party stuff**, no matter how popular it is. Anything other than **CSS Modules** as a name for the W3C Standard seems unacceptable to me. Remember we're not talking "break the web" like was the case in the `Array.prototype.flatten` story. We're just asking for a popular library to rename their project. Honestly, I don't even find their name very fitting for what it does (which to my understanding is rather "Scoped CSS" - another very generic name that I wouldn't advise either). -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/843#issuecomment-640740550
Received on Monday, 8 June 2020 16:38:59 UTC