Re: [whatwg/url] Add a neato informative table of various URL pieces (#337)

There's been no response on either of my last two posts for two weeks. I don't know if this is because my questions were deemed to dumb to comment on or too difficult to answer. 

I do think @rubys was right when he said that the conflict in terminology is an important place to start. But whereas he suggested choosing one form of terminology based on who the audience is, I'm suggesting sorting out and resolving the conflict so that all audiences can talk with each other and be understood. Can we do that? If we can, then we can proceed to make up a useful and correct (albeit nonnormative) illustration of the syntax.

Regarding URIs and URLs, there is some disagreement in the world about whether they are synonymous or not. It would seem that the folks who set the standard for URLs would be a good authority for establishing the correct answer to that. And when we have that answer, we'll know whether the illustration of the URL syntax also applies to URIs synonymously or needs to be adjusted to apply to URIs.

Are we going to move forward to get an illustration of the syntax done?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/url/issues/337#issuecomment-427490782