Re: [whatwg/url] Add a neato informative table of various URL pieces (#337) from EnnexMB on 2018-10-08 (public-webapps-github@w3.org from October 2018)

From: EnnexMB <notifications@github.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2018 08:35:37 -0700
To: whatwg/url <url@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <whatwg/url/issues/337/427880867@github.com>

Yeah, listing both names in all boxes could make it clearer, even if repetitive.
And yes, the intention would be to link the boxes to the definitions. Is it sufficient to link to the definitions in section 4.1, for example for [`scheme`](https://url.spec.whatwg.org/#concept-url-scheme)? I don't see analogous definitions in the Standard for the API terms.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/url/issues/337#issuecomment-427880867

Received on Monday, 8 October 2018 15:35:59 UTC