- From: Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 May 2018 02:48:47 -0700
- To: whatwg/url <url@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <whatwg/url/pull/391/review/123307438@github.com>
annevk commented on this pull request. Thanks, I mostly have nits. Do we need public suffix as a concept in practice? I haven't seen the need for that so far, but if we add an API it would make sense. > @@ -272,6 +272,97 @@ for further processing. U+0020 SPACE, U+0023 (#), U+0025 (%), U+002F (/), U+003A (:), U+003F (?), U+0040 (@), U+005B ([), U+005C (\), or U+005D (]). +<p>A <a for=/>host</a>'s <dfn for=host export id=concept-host-public-suffix>public suffix</dfn> is +the portion of a <a for=/>host</a> which is controlled by a registrar, public or otherwise. To +obtain <var>host</var>'s <a for=host>public suffix</a>, run the following steps: + +<ol> + <li><p>Let <var>parsed</var> be the result of <a lt="host parser">host parsing</a> <var>host</var>. A host is already parsed (otherwise it wouldn't be a host). You also need to introduce the _host_ variable in the paragraph before the algorithm. > + +<ol> + <li><p>Let <var>parsed</var> be the result of <a lt="host parser">host parsing</a> <var>host</var>. + + <li><p>If <var>parsed</var> is not a <a>domain</a>, return the empty string. + + <li><p>Return the <a for=host>public suffix</a> obtained by executing the + <a href="https://publicsuffix.org/list/">algorithm</a> defined by the Public Suffix List. [[!PSL]]. +</ol> + +<p>A <a for=/>host</a>'s <dfn for=host export id=concept-host-registrable-domain>registrable +domain</dfn> is a formally valid domain name that could be registered at a registry. To obtain +<var>host</var>'s <a for=host>registrable domain</a>, run the following steps: + +<ol> + <li><p>Let <var>parsed</var> be the result of <a lt="host parser">host parsing</a> <var>host</var>. Same comment as above. > @@ -272,6 +272,97 @@ for further processing. U+0020 SPACE, U+0023 (#), U+0025 (%), U+002F (/), U+003A (:), U+003F (?), U+0040 (@), U+005B ([), U+005C (\), or U+005D (]). +<p>A <a for=/>host</a>'s <dfn for=host export id=concept-host-public-suffix>public suffix</dfn> is +the portion of a <a for=/>host</a> which is controlled by a registrar, public or otherwise. To +obtain <var>host</var>'s <a for=host>public suffix</a>, run the following steps: + +<ol> + <li><p>Let <var>parsed</var> be the result of <a lt="host parser">host parsing</a> <var>host</var>. + + <li><p>If <var>parsed</var> is not a <a>domain</a>, return the empty string. This kind of implies that the public suffix is also a string. Perhaps it's cleaner to return null? > + <td><code>com</code> + <td> + <tr> + <td><code>example.com</code> + <td><code>com</code> + <td><code>example.com</code> + <tr> + <td><code>www.example.com</code> + <td><code>com</code> + <td><code>example.com</code> + <tr> + <td><code>sub.www.example.com</code> + <td><code>com</code> + <td><code>example.com</code> + <tr> + <td><code>EXAMPLE.COM</code> This is not a host, but input to the host parser. > + <td><code>com</code> + <td><code>example.com</code> + <tr> + <td><code>github.io</code> + <td><code>github.io</code> + <td> + <tr> + <td><code>whatwg.github.io</code> + <td><code>github.io</code> + <td><code>whatwg.github.io</code> + <tr> + <td><code>whatwg.github.io</code> + <td><code>github.io</code> + <td><code>whatwg.github.io</code> + <tr> + <td><code>إختبار</code> Same as above. And also applies below. > + <td><code>إختبار</code> + <td><code>xn-kgbechtv</code> + <td> + <tr> + <td><code>example.إختبار</code> + <td><code>xn-kgbechtv</code> + <td><code>example.xn-kgbechtv</code> + <tr> + <td><code>sub.example.إختبار</code> + <td><code>xn-kgbechtv</code> + <td><code>example.xn-kgbechtv</code> + </table> +</div> + +<p>Two <a for=/>hosts</a>, <var>A</var> and <var>B</var> are said to be +<dfn for=host export id=concept-host-same-site>same-site</dfn> with each other if either of the We have it as "same origin". Should this be "same site"? > + <td><code>example.إختبار</code> + <td><code>xn-kgbechtv</code> + <td><code>example.xn-kgbechtv</code> + <tr> + <td><code>sub.example.إختبار</code> + <td><code>xn-kgbechtv</code> + <td><code>example.xn-kgbechtv</code> + </table> +</div> + +<p>Two <a for=/>hosts</a>, <var>A</var> and <var>B</var> are said to be +<dfn for=host export id=concept-host-same-site>same-site</dfn> with each other if either of the +following statements are true: + +<ul class=brief> + <li><p><var>A</var> is identical to <var>B</var> This should use concept-host-equals. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/url/pull/391#pullrequestreview-123307438
Received on Friday, 25 May 2018 09:49:10 UTC