- From: Domenic Denicola <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 01 May 2018 06:30:08 -0700
- To: whatwg/streams <streams@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 1 May 2018 13:30:30 UTC
That plan sounds great. An alternative to step 3 that might work nicely would be to wrap the test JS file into a function, e.g. ```js self.runReadableStreamTests = type => { // ... lots of tests here }; ``` and then have two small wrapper test files. This would separate out the test results into two files which can be nicer for test expectation files etc. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/streams/issues/217#issuecomment-385670900
Received on Tuesday, 1 May 2018 13:30:30 UTC