Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] skipWaiting() promise should resolve after promotion to .active (#1187)

@mattto, I just looked into https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/pull/1327. Wouldn't it be nice if we could do https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1187#issuecomment-398394573? 

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1187#issuecomment-398571532

Received on Tuesday, 19 June 2018 22:56:44 UTC