Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] skipWaiting() promise should resolve after promotion to .active (#1187) from Matt Falkenhagen on 2018-06-19 (public-webapps-github@w3.org from June 2018)

From: Matt Falkenhagen <notifications@github.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 16:40:03 -0700
To: w3c/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1187/398578907@github.com>

I dunno, I'm wondering now why we don't just resolve immediately always. It would be simple and no deadlock.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1187#issuecomment-398578907

Received on Tuesday, 19 June 2018 23:40:27 UTC