- From: Erik Wilde <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 09 May 2016 11:29:30 -0700
- To: w3c/manifest <manifest@noreply.github.com>
- Cc:
- Message-ID: <w3c/manifest/pull/458/c217948270@github.com>
On 2016-05-06 23:02, Marcos Cáceres wrote: > Yes. Absolutely - but it means taking on editorial responsibility, and > reviewing changes, etc. sounds good to me, i'd like to do that. > We recognize the people listed as Editors because they've put in > significant hours of work diligently reviewing, and often implementing, > the spec (I.e., one needs to earn their stripes by editing and showing a > long term commitment to the project... Akin to, say, becoming a Blink or > WebKit contributor as recognize by those communities). sure thing. put in the work, get the recognition for doing it. > So, the place to start is by reviewing the spec, making PRs, filing > relevant bugs, making sure the registry is up-to-date etc. > Make sense? it does make sense, as a general approach. but i think we have a bit differing opinions on what works well as a robust/effective approach to manage a registry. you may remember from other specs that i find the "let's create a wiki and be done with it" approach not necessarily the best one. but i guess that's where the editorial fun starts, right? --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/manifest/pull/458#issuecomment-217948270
Received on Monday, 9 May 2016 18:36:22 UTC