- From: Marcos Cáceres <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 09 May 2016 22:35:43 -0700
- To: w3c/manifest <manifest@noreply.github.com>
- Cc:
- Message-ID: <w3c/manifest/pull/458/c218063327@github.com>
> On 10 May 2016, at 4:29 AM, Erik Wilde <notifications@github.com> wrote: > > On 2016-05-06 23:02, Marcos Cáceres wrote: > > Yes. Absolutely - but it means taking on editorial responsibility, and > > reviewing changes, etc. > > sounds good to me, i'd like to do that. > > > We recognize the people listed as Editors because they've put in > > significant hours of work diligently reviewing, and often implementing, > > the spec (I.e., one needs to earn their stripes by editing and showing a > > long term commitment to the project... Akin to, say, becoming a Blink or > > WebKit contributor as recognize by those communities). > > sure thing. put in the work, get the recognition for doing it. > > > So, the place to start is by reviewing the spec, making PRs, filing > > relevant bugs, making sure the registry is up-to-date etc. > > Make sense? > > it does make sense, as a general approach. but i think we have a bit > differing opinions on what works well as a robust/effective approach to > manage a registry. you may remember from other specs that i find the > "let's create a wiki and be done with it" approach not necessarily the > best one. but i guess that's where the editorial fun starts, right? Exactly:) looking forward to collaborating further. > — > You are receiving this because you modified the open/close state. > Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub > --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/manifest/pull/458#issuecomment-218063327
Received on Tuesday, 10 May 2016 05:36:10 UTC