[Bug 23056] Function's length property is inconsistent with EcmaScript

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23056

--- Comment #9 from Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> ---
We could, but why do we want to do that?

Again, why is mapping a WebIDL "optional" argument to something like "arg3 =
undefined" better conceptually than mapping it to "arg3" without an
initializer?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.

Received on Wednesday, 28 August 2013 05:56:08 UTC