- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 05:12:41 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23056
Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jackalmage@gmail.com
--- Comment #8 from Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> > A better mapping is:
>
> No, that's semantically different. In your mapping, if I call foo(1, 2)
> that's the same as calling foo(1, 2, 0), but in the WebIDL behavior arg3
> does not have 0 as a value, or indeed any value at all. It's simply "not
> passed". As is arg5. But arg4 has the value 5.
"Not passed" means passing undefined, so you could just pass that as the
default value.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 28 August 2013 05:12:43 UTC