- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 17:35:55 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16732 --- Comment #1 from Arun <arun@mozilla.com> 2012-04-13 17:35:54 UTC --- Are you sure you mean *instead* of ArrayBuffer, and not *in addition* to ArrayBuffer? Essentially, my question is, should ArrayBufferView *replace* ArrayBuffer in the existing constructor, or should it be an additional optional invocation parameter? -- Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 13 April 2012 17:35:58 UTC