- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 04:58:11 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16732 --- Comment #2 from Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com> 2012-04-16 04:58:09 UTC --- The XHR discussion ended up replacing ArrayBuffer with ArrayBufferView for send(). I think one argument is that authors may have a sliced view and then pass .buffer and not realize that it contains the whole data, which results in buggy code. If we support only ArrayBufferView, we prevent the buggy case from happening (at the cost of making authors create a view). -- Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 16 April 2012 04:58:13 UTC