- From: Oliver Hunt <oliver@apple.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 13:59:11 -0800
- To: Oliver Hunt <oliver@apple.com>
- Cc: Travis Leithead <travil@windows.microsoft.com>, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>, "public-webapi@w3.org" <public-webapi@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <4F575397-2296-495E-9F15-F41DD0FE6967@apple.com>
Hmm, i stand corrected, somehow i wasn't triggering 3/4, the S3/Win behaviour for ALT down, ALT up, ALT down, ALT up is KeyDown, KeyUp, KeyUp Which appears to be due to ALT activating the menu *sigh* --Oliver On Feb 27, 2008, at 1:39 PM, Oliver Hunt wrote: > I think it's probably worth pointing out that the special handling > of ALT is specific to Windows as ALT is used to activate menus, this > does not effect MacOS, and may or may not effect the various linux > browsers (i honestly have no idea what they do and don't have a > linux system to test on). > > That said my (brief) testing of Safari for Windows shows that Safari > correctly pair ALT up/down in all of the scenarios below. The > testcase I used is at http://nerget.com/tests/input-testcase.html > > --Oliver > > On Feb 21, 2008, at 1:09 PM, Travis Leithead wrote: >> I’d like to propose a discussion about the handling of the ALT + >> key combination that will hopefully end in a normative requirement. >> >> In observing IE as well as other browsers, there is “good” x- >> browser consistency between the handling of ALT and pressing a >> modifier key. >> >> While the browsers are mostly consistent, they do so in a way that >> is not very reliable for web developers because key down/key up >> pairs are often not respected (key events get dropped in some >> scenarios). >> >> I’ve identified the following scenarios that we can discuss: >> >> Scenarios for ALT handling where the key combination is not a >> ‘browser-reserved’ key: >> (Using ‘X’ which is a non-reserved accelerator key—at least in IE/ >> Firefox3.) >> >> 1. Scenario 1: down ALT, down x, up ALT, up x >> 2. Scenario 2: down ALT, down x, up x, up ALT >> 3. Scenario 4: down ALT, up ALT, down ALT, down x, up ALT, up x >> 4. Scenario 5: down ALT, up ALT, down ALT, down x, up x, up ALT >> >> In each of these scenarios, an ALT key up or down event is lost, >> resulting in an inconsistent pairing of down/up events for the web >> developer. >> >> When handing scenarios for “browser-reserved” accelerator keys, >> more key events are lost (including the simple ALT down/up pair >> repeated twice). It would be nice to specify (perhaps in an >> appendix) the behavior of browser-reserved accelerator key >> combinations and what should be expected. >> >> To help push the discussion along, I would like to propose two >> potential ideas (one is more drastic than the other): >> >> 1. Create a requirement that browsers emit proper ALT key >> sequences (up/down pairs) to the web page unless focus has shifted >> out of the web page itself—here we would need to try to define >> where to draw the line of when ALT is in focus and when it is not >> in focus related to browser-reserved accelerator actions. >> 2. Remove the emission of modifier key (e.g., Shift/Alt/etc.) >> events from the key identifiers set. Thus, pressing ALT (for >> example) would not emit any keyboard events until a corresponding >> key was pressed. The KeyboardEvent interface will continue to >> support the Boolean modifier key flags so that distinctions between >> a key + a modifier can be made by the web developer, but this will >> cut back and the number of events raised and eliminate the out-of- >> order key event problems (ALT down > key down > ALT up > Key up >> versus ALT down > key down > key up > ALT up). Of course, a side >> effect is that this outcome will also effectively remove the >> detection of single modifier key presses for use in web applications. >
Received on Wednesday, 27 February 2008 21:59:30 UTC