- From: Alex Russell <alex@dojotoolkit.org>
- Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 15:37:25 -0800
- To: public-webapi@w3.org
- Cc: Kris Zyp <kzyp@sitepen.com>
- Message-Id: <35CF7B09-3DE4-42B9-B82F-0A95404407EB@dojotoolkit.org>
Howdy all: So after some brief discussions with Anne and Hixie, I want to start a discussion about some of the open issues I see not being addressed regarding server-sent data. This was agreed as the correct forum for the discussion. I see several major issues that need resolution: * what will become the (defacto) standard for multiple events over a single connection? * what will be done to prevent the current 2-connection limit from locking browsers? First, as background, there are at least 2 partially-implemented solutions available in browsers today. Opera has included an implementation of the WHATWG's sever-sent events, which rely on a simple wire format. The other native option for receiving multiple messages without closing/re-opening a connection is the multipart/x- mixed-replace system (currently implemented in a semi-workable fashion by Mozilla). Given that WHAT-WG seems to be leaning away from server-sent events, and noting that neither approach solve the 2-connection limit problem, I'd like to propose the following for consideration: * that multipart/x-mixed-replace for textual content over XHR be fully specified by this working group * that a new XHR readyState be defined for "message end" as distinct from HTTP connection close or that some other property or event be made available to test for overall connection state * that a new settable property be added to XHR objects which controls how the HTTP connection created by the object is accounted for against the HTTP 1.1 specified 2-connection limit. Today, if multiple tabs open Comet connections to the same originating server, no document in the browser may request any resources from that server, effectively "locking" the domain from further use until one of the Comet connections is closed. Instead of a blanket "bump" to the connection limit (which has un-desireable consequences for existing servers), it may be preferable for servers to be able to provide a header which effectively discounts the connection or a client-side toggle which allocates the connection against a different, per- document limit of connections (up to some high global maximum). Thoughts? -- Alex Russell alex@sitepen.com A99F 8785 F491 D5FD 04D7 ACD9 4158 FFDF 2894 6876 alex@dojotoolkit.org BE03 E88D EABB 2116 CC49 8259 CF78 E242 59C3 9723
Received on Monday, 11 February 2008 23:37:41 UTC