- From: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 16:29:30 -0400
- To: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-webapi@w3.org
Hi, Mohamed- Thanks for your review and corrections. Replies inline. Innovimax SARL wrote (on 10/21/2007 2:58 PM): > > s/provides a attribute/provides an attribute/ > s/english/English/ > > Why is "element" not written "Element" ? same for "text" ? All fixed. > Isn't "ChildrenElementsCount" better ? No, for mysterious reasons of collective nouns, conjoined words, and pluralization in English. ;) (Waves hands in a hypnotic way....) Trust a native speaker on this one. > Anyway, please add some verbing > to explain why this has been added to the original SVG proposal Added a brief note in the Change Log section. The actual explanation is throughout the body of the specification. In short, I prototyped the specification in JS, did some scripting tests using past projects of my own, and found that I needed a way to get the number of elements. Et voila. > Please add informative references to "DOM Level 2 Range & Traversal" > and "DOM Level 3 Core" Done. Meant to do that earlier and forgot. Thanks for the reminder. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Staff Contact, SVG, CDF, and WebAPI
Received on Sunday, 21 October 2007 20:29:56 UTC