- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 11:34:01 +0100
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- CC: public-webapi@w3.org
Anne van Kesteren schrieb:
> On Sat, 17 Feb 2007 21:48:38 +0100, Julian Reschke
> <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
>>> Section 4.2 already talks about this quite explicitly. What do you
>>> want it to say?
>>
>> First of all, it's only the last paragraph of 4.2 which talks about
>> this, so being a bit more specific would probably help.
>>
>> Also, I don't think the consequences of this are obvious to people who
>> aren't very familiar with RFC2616, so it may make sense to spell it
>> out explicitly ("You can't reset a header value unless it's in the
>> above list, it will be appended instead").
>
> Ok, added a note to that effect.
Thanks.
So what do we do with the other headers which are documented to be
non-repeatable, but do not appear in that list?
Best regards, Julian
Received on Sunday, 18 February 2007 10:34:09 UTC