Re: [XMLHttpRequest] Comments on Feb 13 draft

On Sat, 17 Feb 2007 21:48:38 +0100, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>  
wrote:
>> Section 4.2 already talks about this quite explicitly. What do you want  
>> it to say?
>
> First of all, it's only the last paragraph of 4.2 which talks about  
> this, so being a bit more specific would probably help.
>
> Also, I don't think the consequences of this are obvious to people who  
> aren't very familiar with RFC2616, so it may make sense to spell it out  
> explicitly ("You can't reset a header value unless it's in the above  
> list, it will be appended instead").

Ok, added a note to that effect.


Cheers,


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>

Received on Sunday, 18 February 2007 10:23:47 UTC